Engineering Services - Contact Me

faradays law

On this page, you can contact me if you are looking for an engineering consultant.

Please note, I work as an independent engineering consultant.  I am available for consultations only.

Perhaps you need help with anything technical or have questions about alternative energy devices. Let me know.

My consultant rates as an engineering consultant are $100/hour or $600/day.

Comments or questions are welcome.

* indicates required field

Rognerud Research, Inc.
Millbrae, CA 94030, USA

3 comments to Engineering Services – Contact Me

  • loriot


    I am French and I’m a mathematic teacher. Really interested in your website.
    I read hooper’s book and i begin to experiment with gravity coil.
    My question is very simple :

    what is the maximal power in entry of the coil you ever tried? (V.A)
    what is the sensibility of the balance you used ?

    thanks !

  • Your William Hooper experiment wasn’t similar, it was his experiment. also electrons don’t travel in wires like marbles because there is no such thing as electrons. the force travels on the outside of the wire. imagine that.
    scientist say there is no such thing as free energy. well i have got one for ya.

    Clemente Figuera patent # 44267 year 1908

    After three years of constant study, research and on hand experience, i have concluded that the Figuera device operates in said capacity according to the 1908 patent and the following is my interpretation of said free energy device.
    in the patents it can be seen how ingeniously and by mechanical methods, how the engineer tried to generate electrical energy inside a coil by varying the flow of two opposite and opposing magnetic fields, trying to get into the machine the same characteristic behavior of a conventional generator, but without moving parts.
    What is the Figuera device
    In a standard generator we have what is termed a quadrature. the incline and decline of the north magnet and the incline and decline of the south magnet. also we have what is termed “the cogging effect”. the cogging effect is where the rotor passes the stator electromagnet and upon passing the electromagnet an extreme attraction force wants to pull the rotor back in to register (alignment) causing the motor to bog down from the heavy load of the attractive force. this extreme force from present day generators has been the same since the days of Praxii in France and has not changed. thus we are left with a system that is completely crippled from the cogging effect and inefficient beyond belief. the amount of fuel used in this type of system is staggering and certainly benefits only the Oil Companies and tax hungry Governments.
    in the Figuera device both electromagnet accounts for only 1/2 of a quadrature but with no cogging effect what so ever since the device is stationary and no moving parts. thus allowing the half quadrature to be much more efficient in terms of power usage (input) verses power output. since the cogging effect has been removed the amount of power that was wasted on rotation is now available to the system for use to power it’s electromagnets and rotating brush motor which amounts to very little leaving a system that is so efficient it powers it self and the load indefinitely. once the system is started with an external power supply, it can be removed and the system remains running with no noise, lubrication, pollution or waste products to deal with. the implication of such a device is utterly mind boggling and a game changer to the average human. allowing each and every human to grow their own food 24/7 365 days a year, pump their own water, power their own home and personal vehicles. thus changing the very evolution of the human race advancing toward a more productive, peaceful, harmonistic society riding the powerful elite of their choke hold on the human race through control.
    My further understanding is that through my research a setup with two bar magnets facing each other separated by a nonmagnetic bar glued between both like pole faces to keep them separated by a fixed distance and a stationary loop with an attached galvanometer . if the magnets are moved back and forth, the galvanometer will move back and forth with twice the deflection magnitude as that of a single magnet moved at the same rate. proven by Michael Farady, James Clerk Maxwell and William J Hopper.
    The Figuera device consist of a complimentary set of primary opposing electromagnets (Set N and Set S) between them resides an output coil/core (Y) governed by a controller part “G” that varies the currant allowed through the the primary electromagnets.
    the primary electromagnets are varied in currant in unison, one taken high, the other taken low, just enough to clear the secondary then reversed. in the said action a unique condition takes place in the area the secondary output coil resides in causing the condition known as a Motional Electric Field. as both primaries are occupying the same relative space in space, we have a set of conditions where both B fields (Magnetic fields) are opposing one another therefore effectively cancelling each other out. in this unique condition, both fields are effectively equal zero but the electric fields of both electromagnets remain intact therefore doubling the effective E field compared to one electromagnet alone.
    by using a DC source through part G, the original source is effectively split into to two separate feeds allowing the primary electromagnets to be varied separately in unison allowing the cancellation of B fields and the additive E fields to remain to be collected by the secondary, a condition known as a pure BV field. the secondary according to the patent is “properly placed” in this area that is effectively zero B field zone but where the Electric field is actively present and doubled in strength.
    Superimposed magnetic flux from the two sets of electromagnets (Set N and Set S) consists of one electromagnet with left to right spin taken high, and one electromagnet with right to left spin taken low in unison. thus we have a unique condition in the space surrounding the secondary: the resultant magnetic flux, due to superposition of fields, is zero; and the resultant Motional electric field intensity is E = B1 x V1 + (-B1) x (-V2) = 2B1 x V1, or E2, double the intensity attributable to one electromagnet alone, where B1 is the magnetic flux due to the electromagnets and V1, the electron drift velocity in, say, the in and out direction. although the magnetic flux energy in the device is reduced to zero, the electromagnetic induction giving rise to what we term the “motional electric field” has by no means been cancelled nor reduced in any way as both are positive and additive . this is and have been verified by William J Hooper and others.
    another unique condition of the opposing primary electromagnets is that while one electromagnet is taken high, the other is taken low but in doing so in it’s receding action, the rising electromagnet basically shoves the receding electromagnet out of the secondary core into it’s own core from where it’s magnetic field was born. this action causes a considerable amount of magnetic flux to be confined in the said core thus allowing the magnetic energy to be shoved out the back of the receding electromagnet into part G to be stored in a magnetic field for later use therefore feeding it’s self every half turn of part G. if the receding electromagnet is taken down to far or the primary electromagnets are not in complete unison the pressure between them will cease and induction will fall low to the output of the peak of the rising electromagnet.
    Part G
    after much research into the origin and function of part G, i was able to narrow, with the help of a colleague, the origin, device and manufacture of the part G device to Germany and Zeiss or Otto as the manufacturer. both companies produced precision variac of the highest quality and were the go to companies for quality workmanship. more then likely it was Zeiss as the dates and events are to easily lined up. one little known fact is that DC can be used through a variac and produce similar effects of currant restriction through variation with a twist of a knob. Figuera on the other hand chose to have the core wound with one continuous wind, one end to Set N and the other to Set S all while varying the currant through the rotating brush making contact with two winding’s at a time in a make before break scenario to avoid currant disruption to the primary electromagnets. this action would be detrimental to the function of the device if bemf were allowed to take place as all induction would cease and power production would come to a halt.
    part G is a magnetic resistance device rarely used in today’s modern world, a forgotten relic in a world of silicon ic’s that can be had in any style, shape or form. part G is unique as it splits one DC feed into two separate independent feeds. this feat is accomplished through two opposing fields as the currant enters part G through it’s winding’s causing two opposing north magnetic fields. these two magnetic fields restrict the amount of saturation of the core restricting currant flow and through reluctance (magnetics).
    part G is connected to the primary electromagnets to allow the inductive kick back from the receding electromagnet to be stored in it’s core every half turn of the rotating brush, thus allowing the stored magnetic field to be converted into currant feeding the primaries as the brush rotates. this action of part G is similar in action of an inductor allowing energy to be stored and used. as the brush rotates so does the magnetic field.
    when constructing the device a second secondary can be wound on the output core allowing said secondary to be used for the sole purpose of powering the device to replace losses occurred through heat and wire loss, which accounts for very little aiding the inductive kickback from the declining electromagnet allowing the device to be self sustaining.
    once this device is started with an external power supply, the supply can be removed and the device will run indefinitely powering what ever you so choose.
    scientist’s of our present day say that free energy is “impossible” yet their are over 10,000 free energy device patents in the united states and over 40,000 globally, most of which were illegally seized by the patent office under the guise “of national security”. funny thing is the US patent office is not even part of the US Government ( independently owned and operated) yet they are continuously allowed to do so, steeling average citizens free energy patent. the suppression of free energy is coming to an end as all through out the world are becoming aware of the ability to self sustain. Maxwell and Faraday proved with out a doubt, that free energy is possible. if this was not so then why did J. P. Morgan, a rich banker, spend million trying to hide the fee energy equations through Heaviside, Lorentz and possibly Einstein through bribe monies. J. P. Morgan even went so far as to pull school books and had them changed and put back into circulation. he was also responsible for the suppression of the most gifted person of our time, yours truly Nicola Tesla. reducing him to the point of feeding pigeons for the remainder of his life.
    if perpetual motion is not viable, then apparently our Universe did not get the memo, wouldn’t that be awkward if the world stop spinning tomorrow.

  • Agatha Lorentz

    Dear Nils,
    I have a Physics question :
    Would you be interested in performing
    a simple anti-gravity experiment?
    Please, let me know.
    Thank you.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>